Oriflame India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Oriflame India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Oriflame India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~5 to 7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of decision: 10.04.2018
+ ITA 812/2017
ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Appellant
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Respondent
+ ITA 813/2017
ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant
versus
+
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX..... Respondent ITA 825/2017
ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant
versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
..... Respondent
Present:Mr.Himanshu Sinha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates for petitioner. Advocates for petitioner.
Mr.Deepak Anand, Jr.Standing Counsel for Revenue.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT)
%
1. The appeals are allowed.
2. For reasons, the judgment dated 10.4.2018 in ITA 811/2017 may be referred to. referred to.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
APRIL 10, 2018 ndn
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue