Case LawHigh Court › Our High Court In Commissioner Of Income...

Our High Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Unitedwestern Bank Ltd. (2003) 259 Itr 312, Which Has

High Court 12 Jul 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Our High Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Unitedwestern Bank Ltd. (2003) 259 Itr 312, Which Has
Date of order
12 Jul 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Our High Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Unitedwestern Bank Ltd. (2003) 259 Itr 312, Which Has, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Issue: In the above, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the interest on Securities arising/accruing to the assessee is not liable to tax under the provisions of...

Decision: Appeal stands disposed of, however, with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No. 1065 of 2000 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Thane .. Appellant V/s. The Pen Co-op. Urban Bank Ltd., Raigad .. Respondent Dr. P. Daniel with Mr. G. Hariharan for the Appellant Ms. A. Khan i/b. Mr. V.B. Joshi for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 12.07.2005. DATED : 12.07.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondent. In the above, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the interest on Securities arising/accruing to the assessee is not liable to tax under the provisions of Interest Tax Act, 1974?" 2. Both the learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondent very fairly state that the above question of law has already been considered by a Division Bench of our High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. UnitedWestern Bank Ltd. (2003) 259 ITR 312, which has answered the question in favour of the assessee in the affirmative. 3. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the above question is answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Appeal stands disposed of, however, with no order as to costs. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan