Our High Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Unitedwestern Bank Ltd. (2003) 259 Itr 312, Which Has
High Court
12 Jul 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Our High Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Unitedwestern Bank Ltd. (2003) 259 Itr 312, Which Has
Date of order
12 Jul 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Our High Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Unitedwestern Bank Ltd. (2003) 259 Itr 312, Which Has, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Issue: In the above, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the interest on Securities arising/accruing to the assessee is not liable to tax under the provisions of...
Decision: Appeal stands disposed of, however, with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Income Tax Appeal No. 1065 of 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Thane .. Appellant
V/s.
The Pen Co-op. Urban Bank Ltd., Raigad .. Respondent
Dr. P. Daniel with Mr. G. Hariharan for the Appellant
Ms. A. Khan i/b. Mr. V.B. Joshi for the Respondent
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 12.07.2005.
DATED : 12.07.2005.
P.C.:-
P.C.:-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the
learned counsel for the Respondent. In the above, the
following substantial question of law is sought to be
raised:-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in
holding that the interest on Securities
arising/accruing to the assessee is not liable to
tax under the provisions of Interest Tax Act,
1974?"
2. Both the learned counsel for the Appellant and the
Respondent very fairly state that the above question of
law has already been considered by a Division Bench of
our High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. UnitedWestern Bank Ltd. (2003) 259 ITR 312, which has
answered the question in favour of the assessee in the
affirmative.
3. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the
above question is answered in the affirmative in favour
of the assessee and against the Revenue. Appeal stands
disposed of, however, with no order as to costs.
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.H. BHATIA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.