P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J
High Court
04 Jun 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J
Date of order
04 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2013/14TH JYAISHTA 1935
WP(C).No. 13989 of 2013 ()
---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
PERINTHLMANNA SERVICE CO-OPERATRIVE BANK LTD.HOSPITAL ROAD, PERINTHLMANNAMALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN 679 322REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE
BY ADVS.SRI.K.ANAND (SR.)
SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1.THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2, OFFICE OF THE ASST.COMMISSIONERWARD 2, OFFICE OF THE ASST.COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX, TARIFF BAZARTOWN HALL ROAD, TIRUR 676 101.
2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)KOZHIKODE 673 020.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-06-2013,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
APPENDIX
EXHIBIT P1:TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20.03.2013
EXHIBIT P2:TRUE COPY OF APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 10.04.2013.
EXHIBIT P3:TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 21.05.2013.
EXHIBIT P4:TRUE COPY OF PETITION UNDER SEC. 220(6) DATED 19.04.2013.
EXHIBIT P5:TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 01.05.2013 PASSED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT.RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P6:TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION.
EXHIBIT P7:TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 10.05.2013 ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT.RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J--------------------------------
WP(C) NO. 13989 OF 2013------------------------------------
Dated this the 4[th] day of June, 2013
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal accompanied byExt.P3 petition for stay against Ext.P1 order of assessment. Thepetitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P7 letter issued preparatory to theinitiation of coercive proceedings for realisation of the disputedtax.
2.I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P3petition for stay with notice to the petitioner within a period ofone month. The coercive proceedings proposed in Ext.P7 lettershall be put on hold till orders are passed on Ext.P3 petition forstay as directed above. The petitioner shall produce a copy ofthe Writ Petition with the judgment before the secondrespondent for compliance.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.