Case LawHigh Court › P.a To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J

P.a To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J

High Court 13 Jun 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
P.a To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J
Date of order
13 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In P.a To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2013/23RD JYAISHTA 1935 WP(C).No. 14996 of 2013 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- SMT. MONISENAN, W/O.LATE E.K.CHANDRASENAN, PLOT NO.30, MONIMANDIR, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN - 682 036. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INVESTIGATION CIRCLE-I, DIVISION-1, ERNAKULAM 682 016. 2. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, MUNICIPAL BUILDING, WEST FORT THRISSUR - 680 004. 3. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER-V (1), 15, SHAFEE MOHAMMED ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 006. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, COCHIN - 682 018. 5. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN - 682 018. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-06-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 14996 of 2013 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFICATION ORDER DATED 28/02/1997 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 1982-83 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFICATION ORDER DATED 28/02/1997 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 1983-84 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFICATION ORDER DATED 28/02/1997 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 1984-85 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFICATION ORDER DATED 25/04/1994 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 1985-86 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXT.P5:TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFICATION ORDER DATED 25/04/1994 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 1986-87 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXT.P6:TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFICATION ORDER DATED 25/04/1994 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 1987-88 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF PAYMENT MADE BY THE PETITIONER UNDERDIFFERENT PROVISIONS. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE IN FORM NO.ITCP-17 VIDE TR NO.98(T)/99 DATED8/02/2000 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE IN FORM NO.ITCP-13 VIDE TR NOS.7,8,9/96-97/V(1)DATED 22/02/1999 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 21/5/2012 SUBMITTED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P11: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 1/11/2012 SUBMITTED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------------- W.P(c). No. 14996 OF 2013 ---------------------------------------------Dated this the 13[th] day of June, 2013 J U D G M E N T The petitioner contends that there is no justification forcontinuing the attachment even after the entire arrears of taxhave been paid. The petitioner had in this regard submittedExt.P10 representation which is pending consideration with thefourth respondent. 2. I direct the fourth respondent to consider Ext.P10representation with notice to the petitioner within a period of twomonths. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petitionwith the judgment before the fourth respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sou. Sd/- V. CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE. // True copy //
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan