P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013/28TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 20465 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------------ N.HARINARAYANAN AGED 47 YEARS S/O C.T.NARAYANAN, CHAKKARATHU VEEDU, NORTH KULAMAKKAL M.O.WARD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.M.S.KIRAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, ALAPPUZHA INCOME TAX OFFICE, AARATTUKULAKKARA COMPLEX OPP. GENERAL HOSPITAL, AN PURAM, ALAPPUZHA-688 011. INCOME TAX OFFICE, AARATTUKULAKKARA COMPLEX OPP. GENERAL HOSPITAL, AN PURAM, ALAPPUZHA-688 011. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS , KOCHI. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON19-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J-------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 20465 OF 2013 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 19[th] day of August, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal against Ext.P1 orderof assessment. The appeal is accompanied by a petition tocondone delay and Ext.P3 petition for stay. The petitioner isaggrieved by the coercive steps proposed in Ext.P4 notice evenbefore the disposal of the appeal and the petitions. 2.I direct the second respondent to consider the petitionfor condonation of delay as well as Ext.P3 petition for stay withnotice to the petitioner within a period of two months. Thecoercive steps pursuant to Ext.P4 order shall be put on hold tillorders are passed on the petitions aforestated. The petitionershall produce a copy of the Writ Petition with the judgmentbefore the second respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. ncd V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE