P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 28813 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- HASSAIANR T.M.CHUNGATHARA HOUSEMASJID LANE, THAMMANAMKOCHI 682 032. BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR SRI.K.UMAMAHESWAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1.INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2(2), C.R. BUILDINGSI.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI 682 018.2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)C.R. BUILDINGS, I.S. PRESS ROADKOCHI - 682 018. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON22-11-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J-------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 28813 OF 2013 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 22[nd] day of November, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal against Ext.P1 orderof assessment. The appeal is accompanied by Ext.P3 petition forstay of recovery of the disputed tax. The petitioner is aggrievedby Ext.P4 demand notice served on him in the meanwhile. 2.I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P3petition with notice to the petitioner within a period of twomonths. The coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 order and Ext.P4notice shall be put on hold till orders are passed on Ext.P3petition as directed above. 3.The petitioner shall produce a copy of the WritPetition with the judgment before the second respondent forcompliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE