P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013/28TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 20464 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- HONEY RAHULAN, AGED 50 YEARS W/O.N.SREEKUMAR, CHAKKARATHU VEEDU, NORTH KULAMAKKAL M.O.WARD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.M.S.KIRAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, ALAPPUZHA, INCOME TAX OFFICE AARATTUKULAKKARA COMPLEX, OPP. GENERAL HOSPITAL AN PURAM, ALAPPUZHA-688 011. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS KOCHI. R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON19-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J-------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 20464 OF 2013 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 19[th] day of August, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed Exts.P3 and P5 appeals againstExts.P1 and P2 orders of assessment. The appeals areaccompanied by petitions for condonation of delay and Exts. P4and P6 petitions for stay. The petitioner is aggrieved by thecoercive steps proposed in Ext.P7 order even before the disposalof the appeal and the petitions aforestated. 2.I direct the second respondent to consider thepetitions for condonation of delay and Exts.P4 and P6 petitionswith notice to the petitioner within a period of two months. Thecoercive steps proposed in Ext.P7 order shall be put on hold tillorders are passed on the petitions aforestated. The petitionershall produce a copy of the Writ Petition with the judgmentbefore the second respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE