P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J
High Court
31 Oct 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J
Date of order
31 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
2007-08, 2006-07, 2009-10, 2010-11
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/9TH KARTHIKA, 1935
WP(C).No. 26669 of 2013 (G)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
JOSHI MANUELKARANKAL HOUSEELIKULAM P.O.PALA - 686 577.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31-10-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.26669/2013
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1:[TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 05.03.2013.]
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 05.03.2013.
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 07.03.2013.
EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT MADE FOR THE YEAR 2006-07.
EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF CYBER RECEIPT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR2007-08.2007-08.
EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2008-09
EXHIBIT P7: TRRUE COPY OF RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2009-10.
EXHIBIT P8: TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2010-11.
EXHIBIT P9: TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2011-12.
EXHIBIT P10: TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13.
EXHIBIT P11: TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 127.04.2013 FOR THE YEAR 2006-2007.2007.
EXHIBIT P12: TRUE COPY STAY PETITION DATED 18.04.2013.
EXHIBIT P13: TRUE COPY OF APPEAL PETITION FOR 2007-2008 DATED17.04.2013.17.04.2013.
EXHIBIT P14: TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION FOR STAY OF COLLECTION OFDISPUTED TAX FOR THE YEAR 2007-2008.DISPUTED TAX FOR THE YEAR 2007-2008.
EXHIBIT P15: TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FOR 2008-09.
EXHIBIT P16: TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION FOR 2008-09.
EXHIBIT P17: TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FOR 2009-2010
EXHIBIT P18: TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER18.04.2013.18.04.2013.
WP(C) NO. 26669/2013
EXHIBIT P19: TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED17.04.2013.17.04.2013.
EXHIBIT P20: TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION FOR THE YEAR 2010-11.
EXHIBIT P21: TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST ASSESSMENT FOR 2011-12.12.
EXHIBIT P22: TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 18.04.2013.
EXHIBIT P23: TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FOR 2012-2013.
EXHIBIT P24: TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 18.04.2013 FILED FOR THEYEAR 2012-13.YEAR 2012-13.
EXHIBIT P25: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 05.09.2013 FOR THEYEAR 2006-2007.YEAR 2006-2007.
EXHIBIT P26: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE FOR THE YEAR 2007-08
EXHIBIT P27: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE FOR THE YEAR 2008-09
EXHIBIT P28: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE FOR THE YEAR 2009-10
EXHIBIT P29: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE FOR THE YEAR 2010-11
EXHIBIT P30: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE FOR THE YEAR 2011-12
EXHIBIT P31: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
EXHIBIT P32: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07.
EXHIBIT P33: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08.
EXHIBIT P34: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-093ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-093
EXHIBIT P35: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10.
EXHIBIT P36: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11.
EXHIBIT P37: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12.
EXHIBIT P38: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J--------------------------------
WP(C) NO. 26669 OF 2013
------------------------------------
Dated this the 31[st] day of October, 2013
JUDGMENT
Exts.P11, P13, P15, P17, P19, P21 and P23 are the appealspending with the first respondent. The appeals are accompaniedby Exts.P12, P14, P16, P18, P20, P22 and P24 petitions for stay ofrecovery of the disputed amounts. The petitioner is aggrieved byExts.P32 to P38 demand notices served on him during thependency of the appeals and the petitions for stay.
EXHIBIT P37: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12.
EXHIBIT P38: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND DATED 03.09.2013 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J--------------------------------
WP(C) NO. 26669 OF 2013
------------------------------------
Dated this the 31[st] day of October, 2013
JUDGMENT
Exts.P11, P13, P15, P17, P19, P21 and P23 are the appealspending with the first respondent. The appeals are accompaniedby Exts.P12, P14, P16, P18, P20, P22 and P24 petitions for stay ofrecovery of the disputed amounts. The petitioner is aggrieved byExts.P32 to P38 demand notices served on him during thependency of the appeals and the petitions for stay.
2.I direct the first respondent to consider the petitionsfor stay aforementioned within a period of two months afternotice to the petitioner. The coercive steps pursuant to Exts.P25to P31 and Exts.P32 to P38 notices shall be put on hold in themeanwhile.
3.The petitioner shall produce a copy of the Writ Petitionwith the judgment before the first respondent for compliance.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.