P.a. To Judge v. Chitambaresh, J

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013/8TH BHADRA, 1935 WP(C).No. 21462 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- KEERTHI AGRO MILLS (P) LTD. MATTOOR, KALADY, ERNAKULAM KERALA-683574, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR JOHNSON VARGHESE. BY ADVS.SRI.KMV.PANDALAI SMT.S.HEMALATHA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX CIRCLE-1(2), C.R.BUILDINGS, I.S.PRESS ROAD ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682018. ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682018. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-II KERA BAHVAN, KOCHI-682016. KERA BAHVAN, KOCHI-682016. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON30-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 21462 OF 2013 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 30[th] day of August, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed Ext.P3 and P4 appeals againstExts.P1 and P2 orders of assessment under the Income Tax Act.The appeals are accompanied by Exts.P5 and P5(a) petitions forstay of recovery of the disputed tax. The petitioner is aggrievedby Ext.P6 demand notice issued during the pendency of theappeals and the petitions for stay. 2.I direct the second respondent to consider Exts.P5and P5(a) petitions with notice to the petitioner within a periodof two months. The coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P6 noticeshall be put on hold till orders are passed on Exts.P5 and P5(a)petitions as directed above. The petitioner shall produce a copyof the Writ Petition with the judgment before the secondrespondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE