Case LawHigh Court › Padmavati Jayakrishan v. C.i.t. ( 101 It...

Padmavati Jayakrishan v. C.i.t. ( 101 Itr 153 ) And

High Court 29 Aug 1996 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Padmavati Jayakrishan v. C.i.t. ( 101 Itr 153 ) And
Date of order
29 Aug 1996
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Padmavati Jayakrishan v. C.i.t. ( 101 Itr 153 ) And, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.162 of 1983. For Approval and Signature : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE Mr.N.J.PANDYA ��AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE Mr.S.D.PANDIT -------------------------------------------------------- Shri Sunil Siddharthbhai �versus. The Commissioner of Income Tax Gujarat-I Ahmedabad. --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance : Mr.J.P.Shah,for the petitioner. Mr.Mihir Thakore with Mr.Manish R.Bhatt for the respondent CORAM ; N.J.PANDYA & S.D.PANDIT,JJ Date of decision : September 29,1996. ORAL JUDGMENT �This reference has been made at the instance of the assessee. Learned advocate Mr.Shah states that the question involved in this reference is covered by the decision of this Hon'ble High Court in the case of Smt. Padmavati Jayakrishan Vs. C.I.T. ( 101 ITR 153 ) and the said decision has been confirmed by the Appex Court in 166 ITR, 176. Therefore, in view of the decision of the Appex Court, this reference will have to be answered in negative and in favour of the revenue and it is accordingly disposed of with no order as to cost. * * * * *
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan