Pallavi Atul Prakash v. The State Of Bihar
High Court
14 Sep 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Pallavi Atul Prakash v. The State Of Bihar
Date of order
14 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pallavi Atul Prakash v. The State Of Bihar, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
2
14-09-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12940 of 2011
======================================================
1. Kiran Prakash Singh W/O Late Atul Prakash Singh R/O Kidwaipuri (Sumitra Devi Path Near Income Tax Golamber), P.S.- Budha Colony, Distt.- Patna
2. Pallavi Atul Prakash D/O Late Atul Prakash Singh R/O Kidwaipuri (Sumitra Devi Path Near Income Tax Golamber), P.S.- Budha Colony, Distt.- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The District Magistrate, Patna
3. The Senior Superintendent Of Police, Patna
4. The Officer-In-Charge, Budha Colony Police Station, Patna
5. Most. Manna Rani Singh W/O Late Rash Bihari Singh R/O Kidwaipuri, P.S.- Budha Colony, Distt.- Patna
6. Sri Dadan Singh S/O Late Lalchand Singh R/O Yadav Nagar, Naya Tola, Arya Samaj Mandir, R.P.S. More, Baily Road, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna 7. Surendra Prasad @ Surendra Yadav S/O Late Raut Yadav R/O Jhajha, Jamui, P.S.- Jhajha, Distt.- Jamui
8. Abhishek Kumar S/O Sri Surendra Prasad @ Surendra Yadav R/O Kidwaipuri, Sumitra Devi Path, P.S.- Budha Colony, Distt.-Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Bihari Singh For the Respondent/s : A.C. to S.C. 33
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDALORAL ORDER
Mr. Binod Bihari Singh for the petitioners and A.C. to S.C.
33 for the State are present.
Mr. Singh seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this
application.
The State has no objection.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.