Panaji v. Resources International
High Court
16 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Panaji v. Resources International
Date of order
16 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Panaji v. Resources International, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 2.The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Santosh
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
STAMP NUMBER (MAIN) NO.3611 OF 2017.
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Panaji.
...…. Appellant.
Versus
Resources International.
…..... Respondent.
Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Coram : Shantanu S. Kemkar &
N.M. Jamdar, JJ.
Date : 16 August 2018.
P.C.:
The learned Counsel for the Appellant, on instructionsreceived through email dated 6 August 2018 from the Appellant andin view of the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11 July 2018, as the taxeffect in this Appeal is below 50.00 lakhs, seeks leave to withdraw₹this Appeal. The prayer is accepted.
2.
2.The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it isobserved that in case the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11 July 2018which is subject matter of challenge before the Supreme Court inPublic Interest Litigation (PIL) in Writ Petition (Civil) No.851 of
2 stm3611-17-16-08-18
2018 is set aside, it will be open for the Revenue to seek revival of thisAppeal.
N.M. Jamdar, J.
Shantanu S. Kemkar, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue