Panaji v. The Bardez Urban Cooperative Credit Society
High Court
04 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Panaji v. The Bardez Urban Cooperative Credit Society
Date of order
04 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Panaji v. The Bardez Urban Cooperative Credit Society, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The learned StandingCounsel states that Public Interest Litigation is pending in the ApexCourt challenging the Circular dated 11 July 2018 and thewithdrawal be made, subject to the outcome of the Petition.Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of as withdrawn, subject to theabove.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
mukund
1 txa3.18 & connected matters dt.4.10.18
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO.3 OF 2018
The Principal Commissioner of Income
Tax,
Panaji.
… Appellant
Versus
The Bardez Urban Cooperative Credit Society
Ltd.
... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Mr. Somnath B. Karpe, Advocate for the Respondent.
WITH
Tax Appeal No.18/2009
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
WITH
Tax Appeal No.1/2017
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Ms.Vinita Palyekar, Advocate for the Respondent.
WITH
Tax Appeal No.21/2018
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Mr. Somnath B. Karpe, Advocate for the Respondent.
WITH
Tax Appeal No.22/2018
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Mr. P.Shirodkar, Advocate for the Respondent.
WITH
Tax Appeal No.24/2018
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. Gaurang Panandikar, Advocate for the Respondent.
WITH
mukund 3 txa3.18 & connected matters dt.4.10.18
Tax Appeal No.145/2017
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. Somnath B.Karpe, Advocate for the Respondent.
WITH
Tax Appeal No.152/2017
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. S.R.Rivankar with Mr.Rama Rivankar, Advocates for theRespondent.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar &
Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.
Date : 4 October 2018.
P.C.:
The learned Standing counsel appearing for theAppellant states that the effect of the CBDT Circular dated 11 July2018 has been examined in respect of these Appeals wherein the taxeffect is below the stipulated limit. The learned Standing Counselstates that the instructions have been received from the Appellant towithdraw the Appeals in view of the Circular. The learned StandingCounsel states that Public Interest Litigation is pending in the ApexCourt challenging the Circular dated 11 July 2018 and thewithdrawal be made, subject to the outcome of the Petition.Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of as withdrawn, subject to theabove.
Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.N.M. Jamdar, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue