Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 1, Ltu, Chennai
High Court
23 Sep 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 1, Ltu, Chennai
Date of order
23 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 1, Ltu, Chennai, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP No.22856 of 2025
in TCA SR No.97377 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
C.M.P.No.22856 of 2025in T.C.A.SR No.97377 of 2025
Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd,No.77,Old No.35, 3rd Floor, Pottpatti Plaza, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034.
Vs
Applicant
The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle - 1, LTU, Chennai.
Respondent
For Applicant:
Mr.Logesh.G.for Mr.Sivaraman.R.
For Respondent:
Ms.V.PushpaSr. Standing Counsel
___________
Page 1 of 2
CMP No.22856 of 2025 in TCA SR No.97377 of 2025
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard.
2. This application is filed to condone the delay of 91 days in filing the appeal.
3. Taking into consideration the period of delay and the cause
shown, the delay is condoned. The application is allowed.
List the appeal for admission.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 23.09.2025
sasi
___________
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.