Case LawHigh Court › Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd v. Th...

Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 1, Ltu, Chennai

High Court 23 Sep 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 1, Ltu, Chennai
Date of order
23 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 1, Ltu, Chennai, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP No.22856 of 2025 in TCA SR No.97377 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.No.22856 of 2025in T.C.A.SR No.97377 of 2025 Panasonic Carbon India Company Ltd,No.77,Old No.35, 3rd Floor, Pottpatti Plaza, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. Vs Applicant The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle - 1, LTU, Chennai. Respondent For Applicant: Mr.Logesh.G.for Mr.Sivaraman.R. For Respondent: Ms.V.PushpaSr. Standing Counsel ___________ Page 1 of 2 CMP No.22856 of 2025 in TCA SR No.97377 of 2025 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard. 2. This application is filed to condone the delay of 91 days in filing the appeal. 3. Taking into consideration the period of delay and the cause shown, the delay is condoned. The application is allowed. List the appeal for admission. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 23.09.2025 sasi ___________ Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan