Case LawHigh Court › Pankaj Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-...

Pankaj Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Makrana

High Court 10 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pankaj Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Makrana
Date of order
10 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Pankaj Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Makrana, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4471/2022 Pankaj Jain S/o Shri Padam Chand Jain, Aged About 29 Years,Prop. Of M/s Rajdhani Chem Food, Resident Of Gangwal Bhawan,Main Road, Near Bus Stand, Mithari, Tehsil Nawa, Nagaur341542. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Makrana Having Its AddressAt Near Byepass Railway Overbridge, Shiv Colony,Makrana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan 341505.At Near Byepass Railway Overbridge, Shiv Colony,Makrana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan 341505. 2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Ministry Of Finance, HavingIts Address At North Block, New Delhi 110011 ThroughIts Chairman.Its Address At North Block, New Delhi 110011 ThroughIts Chairman. ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4795/2022 Padam Chand Jain Huf, Through Its Karta Shri Padam Chand JainSon Of Shri Bhanwar Lal Jain, Aged About 57 Years, Having ItsAddress At Gangwal Bhawan, Village Mithari, Near Bus Stand,Tehsil Nawa, Nagaur 341509. ----PetitionerVersus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Makrana Having Its AddressAt Near Byepass Railway Overbridge, Shiv Colony,Makrana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan 341505.At Near Byepass Railway Overbridge, Shiv Colony,Makrana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan 341505. 2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Ministry Of Finance, HavingIts Address At North Block, New Delhi 110011 ThroughIts Chairman.Its Address At North Block, New Delhi 110011 ThroughIts Chairman. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshvardhan SinghFor Respondent(s): Mr. Vikram Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/11/2022 Learned counsel Shri Harshvardhan Singh submits that boththese writ petitions have been rendered infructuous in view of thejudgment rendered by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case ofUnion of India & Ors. vs Ashish Agarwal reported in 2022SCC online SC 543. In view of the submissions so made, both the writ petitionsare disposed of as having rendered infructuous. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 14-Sudhir Asopa/- (SANDEEP MEHTA),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan