Pankaj v. The State Of Rajasthan
High Court
01 Dec 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pankaj v. The State Of Rajasthan
Date of order
01 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pankaj v. The State Of Rajasthan, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 394/2023
Pankaj S/o Rai Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Quarter No.121, 2Nd Floor, Income Tax Colony, Jyoti Ngar, District Jaipur,Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,Department Of Animal Husbandry, Govt. Secretariat,Jaipur (Raj.).Department Of Animal Husbandry, Govt. Secretariat,Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Kashmi Kaur Raan, Principal Cum Deputy Secretary,Department Of Animal Husbandry, Govt. Of Rajasthan,Secretariat, Jaipur.Department Of Animal Husbandry, Govt. Of Rajasthan,Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Shri Hari Prasad Sharma, Chairman Cum Secretary,Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Staff SelectionBoard, Jaipur, Rajasthan.Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Staff SelectionBoard, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Neel, Adv. on behalf ofMr. Vigyan Shah, Adv.Mr. Vigyan Shah, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Ms. Sheetal Mirdha, AAG
Mr. Arpit Jain, Adv. on behalf of
Mr. Nagin G. Narain, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
01/12/2023
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that thiscontempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of theex-parte interim order dated 13.01.2023. Thereafter, vide orderdated 19.08.2023 passed by this Court, the writ petition hasfinally been decided. Therefore, this contempt petition has beenrendered infructuous.
In this view of the matter, the contempt petition stands
disposed of.
Notices stand discharged.
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh
petition assailing the final order passed in the writ petition.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /125
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.