Paradeep Phosphates Ltd., Bhubaneswar v. Mr. Adhiraj Mohanty, Advocate
High Court
12 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Paradeep Phosphates Ltd., Bhubaneswar v. Mr. Adhiraj Mohanty, Advocate
Date of order
12 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Paradeep Phosphates Ltd., Bhubaneswar v. Mr. Adhiraj Mohanty, Advocate, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of keeping the questions of law raised herein open to be considered at the appropriate stage.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ITA No. 53 of 2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Bhubaneswar
…..
Appellant
Mr. Subash Chandra Mohanty, Senior Standing Counsel (IT)
Paradeep Phosphates Ltd., Bhubaneswar
Vs.
…..
Respondent
Mr. Adhiraj Mohanty, Advocate
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER 12.04.2024
Order No.
02.
This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
2. Heard Mr. S.C. Mohanty, learned Senior Standing Counsel (IT) appearing for the appellant and Mr. Adhiraj Mohanty, learned counsel for the Respondent.
3. As it appears, the present appeal has been filed against the order dated 09.11.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in ITA Nos. 315/CTK/2015 and 331/CTK/2015 for the assessment year 2008-2009.
4. Mr. Subash Chandra Mohanty, learned Senior Standing
Counsel (IT) appearing for the appellant though contended that this appeal has been filed against the order passed by the Tribunal on the question of law, but, on a query being made by this Court, he could not give any information as to what has happened during the period from 2018 to 2024, when this appeal, which was filed in the year 2018, is moved today and in the meantime more than six years have
passed. When the order impugned was passed by the Tribunal on 09.11.2017, the same must have reached finality and in case, at this stage, this Court interferes with the said order, it may dislocate the entire situation and unsettle the settled position. The record also reveals that from the date of filing of this appeal six years have passed and during all these periods no endeavour has been made from the side of the revenue to pursue this matter and, when this Court asked, learned counsel appearing for the revenue could not be able to state the position of the case at this point of time.
5. For all the above reasons, this Court is not inclined to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of keeping the questions of law raised herein open to be considered at the appropriate stage.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Subhasmita
(G. SATAPATHY) JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: SUBHASMITA DASDesignation: Sr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of OrissaDate: 15-Apr-2024 18:30:00
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.