Paradise Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii
High Court
15 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Paradise Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii
Date of order
15 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Paradise Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: In the light of the same, the appeal filed by theassessee stands disposed of on the ground of the assessee havingavailed the benefit of the said Scheme.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-9
ITAT/56/2016
IA No.GA/1/2016 (Old No.GA/134/2016)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
PARADISE VYAPAAR PVT. LTD.
-Versus-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOLKATA-III
Appearance:Mr. Somak Basu, Adv....for the appellant.Ms. Smita Das De, Adv....for the respondent.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
-And-
The Hon’ble JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK
Date : 15[th] July, 2022.The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity)is directed against the order dated 10[th] August, 2015 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, “B” Bench, Kolkata in ITANo.1664/Kol/2013 for the assessment years 2008-09.
We have heard Mr. Somak Basu, learned counsel for the
appellant/assessee and Ms. Smita Das De, learned standing counselappearing for the respondent/revenue.
The learned Advocate appearing for the appellant
submitted that the assessee has availed the benefit of DirectTaxes Vivad se Viswas Scheme and Form-V has been issued to theassessee on 27[th] January, 2022.
In the light of the same, the appeal filed by theassessee stands disposed of on the ground of the assessee havingavailed the benefit of the said Scheme.
Consequently, the substantial questions of law assuggested by the assessee are left open.
Consequently, the connected application for stay (IANo.GA/134/2016) also stands closed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.