Case LawHigh Court › Param Developers v. Income Tax Officer,...

Param Developers v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1

High Court 29 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Param Developers v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1
Date of order
29 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Param Developers v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: Permission as sought for is grantedwithout going into the merits of the matter.Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16193 of 2021 ========================================================== PARAM DEVELOPERS VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 ========================================================== Appearance: MR. HARDIK V VORA(7123) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANIandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK Date : 29/10/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI) 1.Petitioner has preferred this petition seeking following reliefs: “Prayer: 5.The Petitioner accordingly prays that thisHon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue: a.A Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ,order or direction in the nature of Certiorariquashing the impugned notice dated 31.03.2021issued under section 148 of the Act for theassessment year 2017-18; b.Pending the admission, hearing and finaldisposal of this petition, restrain therespondent from proceeding further consequent tonotice dated 31.03.2021 and/or passing the orderof re-assessment; c.Pass any other order(s) as this Hon’bleCourt may deem fit and more appropriate in orderto grant interim relief to the Petitioner; d.Any other and further relief deemed just C/SCA/16193/2021 ORDER DATED: 29/10/2021 and proper be granted in the interest ofjustice;e.To provide for the cost of this petition”justice;e.To provide for the cost of this petition” 2.Mr. Hardik Vora, learned advocate for thepetitioner seeks permission to withdraw thispetition. Permission as sought for is grantedwithout going into the merits of the matter.Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.petitioner seeks permission to withdraw thispetition. Permission as sought for is grantedwithout going into the merits of the matter.Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. (MS. SONIA GOKANI, J. ) SUDHIR (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan