Paramjeet Kaur Reen v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 And Another
High Court
22 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Paramjeet Kaur Reen v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 And Another
Date of order
22 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Paramjeet Kaur Reen v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 And Another, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: DATE : FEBRUARY 22, 2022 P.C.: .Having heard counsels, we hereby set aside the order dated23[rd] February, 2021 passed under section 264 of the Income TaxAct, 1961 for A.Y.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
VISHALSUBHASHPAREKAR
Digitally signed byVISHAL SUBHASHPAREKARDate: 2022.02.2215:40:51 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2567 OF 2021
Paramjeet Kaur Reen vs.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-17and Another
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Ms. Radha Halbe i/b. Devendra Jain, for the Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents.
CORAM :K.R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE :
FEBRUARY 22, 2022
P.C.:
.Having heard counsels, we hereby set aside the order dated23[rd] February, 2021 passed under section 264 of the Income TaxAct, 1961 for A.Y. 2016-17 and remand the matter for denovoconsideration.
2.Petitioner may file further submissions, if they so wish within
two weeks from the date this order is uploaded.
3.Principal Commissioner, Income Tax-17 shall give a personalhearing to Petitioner before passing any order and the date ofpersonal hearing shall be communicated at least seven workingdays in advance. If PCIT is going to rely on any order or judgment ofany Court or Tribunal other than those referred to in the impugnedorder, a list thereof shall also be provided along with a notice for
personal hearing. The order passed shall deal with all submissionsmade by Petitioner and shall contain reasons for the conclusionarrived at.
4.Petition disposed.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue