Parasram Mordia v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(2), Jaipur, Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur
High Court
28 Jan 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Parasram Mordia v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(2), Jaipur, Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur
Date of order
28 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Parasram Mordia v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(2), Jaipur, Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for boththe parties, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1376/2022
Parasram Mordia S/o Late Sh. Vishweshwar Lal Mordia, Aged About 73Years, R/o R-2, Raghuvihar Lal Kothi Scheme, Jaipur 302015,Rajasthan, India.
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(2), Jaipur, NCR Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Vijay, Advocate through VC For Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate through VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMARJudgment / Order
28/01/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel forthe revenue at the outset would submit that the issue involved in thispetition is no longer res integra as it has been put to an end by DivisionBench of this Court in the decision rendered on 27.01.2022 in SudeshTaneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ PetitionNo. 969/2022 and batch of petitions) where the notices issued underSection 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalidand impermissible in law and quashed.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for boththe parties, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
Mohita /8
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.