Case LawHigh Court › Parent’s Association Of Medical Students...

Parent’s Association Of Medical Students,Maharashtra v. Director General Of Income-Tax (Inv) Pune & Ors

High Court 07 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Parent’s Association Of Medical Students,Maharashtra v. Director General Of Income-Tax (Inv) Pune & Ors
Date of order
07 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Parent’s Association Of Medical Students,Maharashtra v. Director General Of Income-Tax (Inv) Pune & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 5.Public Interest Petition is disposed of accordingly. [N.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Amk (16) PIL 82-06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 82 OF 2006 Parent’s Association of Medical Students,Maharashtra .. Petitioner Vs. Director General of Income-Tax (INV) Pune & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. L. M. Acharya for the Petitioner. Mr. Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 & 18. Mr. Ganesh Gole for Respondent No.6-MCI. Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav i/b Mr. V. P. Sawant for Respondent Nos.11 & 12. CORAM :PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. &N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE :7 th JUNE, 2019. P. C.: 1.Case pleaded in the Public Interest Petitions is that RespondentNos.7 to 18 are Trusts which have established medical colleges. Someof them are affiliated to State Universities and some of them haveindependent status of deemed universities. It is pleaded that in themonth of July-August, 2005 Income Tax Department conducted raidsand recovered incriminating documents showing money laundering andtax evasion. It is pleaded that from the documents seized siphoning offunds emerged. Grievance is to the Income Tax Department not taking (16) PIL 82-06 the raids to their logical conclusion and to the continued approval to theprivate Respondents to continue education in the field of medicines andthe deemed Universities status granted to Respondent Nos.7 to 18. 2.The response filed by the Income Tax Authority brings out thatafter the raids were conducted, the documents seized were processed,notices required were issued and assessment order was passedconcerning the private Respondents. Response filed to the right tocontinue to impart education is that after evaluating the infrastructureavailable and as per policy, it being found that the entitlement for grantof deemed Universities status was as per law. 3.To the counter affidavits which were filed way back in the year2007, no rejoinder has been filed by the Petitioner. 4.A Public Interest Litigation cannot be pursued at the pleasure ofthe Petitioner and thus keeping in view the reply we terminate thePublic Interest Petitions by discharging the notice. 5.Public Interest Petition is disposed of accordingly. [N. M. JAMDAR, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan