In Parikh Enterprises Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ PARIKH ENTERPRISES PVT.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 30 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ PARIKH ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 30 of 1987 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 MR AKIL QURESHI for MR RP BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 31/07/2001
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
�This reference has been filed at the instance of
the applicant. �At the time when the matter was called out, nobody has appeared for the applicant. In the
�At the time when the matter was called out, nobody has appeared for the applicant. In the circumstances, we decline to answer the question referred
to us.
�The reference stands disposed of accordingly with
no order as to costs.
�����(A.R. Dave, J.)
�����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
(hn)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.