Parnax Lab Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income
High Court
10 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Parnax Lab Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income
Date of order
10 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Parnax Lab Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby MANOJ RMANOJ RTANDALETANDALEDate:2022.01.1114:16:40 +0530
Tandle
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 78 OF 2020
Parnax Lab Limited VersusAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax-7(3)(1) And Ors.
… Petitioner.
… Respondents.
. . . . . .
Mr. Jeet Kamdar i/b. Mr. A. K. Jasani for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
. . . . . .
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM AND
N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE : 10[th] JANUARY, 2022
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
P. C.:
1.Writ Petition heard for some time.
2.Mr. Kamdar, learned counsel for Petitioner sought leave of theCourt to withdraw the Petition and at the same time liberty was sought tokeep open their rights and contentions to be raised before the AssessingOfficer.
3.Keeping open all rights and contentions of Petitioner, Petitionis dismissed as withdrawn.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue