Parth Dineshbhai Patel v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1
High Court
26 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Parth Dineshbhai Patel v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1
Date of order
26 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Parth Dineshbhai Patel v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.The present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16104 of 2021
==========================================================
PARTH DINESHBHAI PATEL VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1
==========================================================
Appearance:
DARSHAN R PATEL(8486) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANIandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Date : 26/10/2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)
1.The petitioner is before this Court seeking to challengethe notice dated 31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act with the following reliefs:-
“(A)Issue a writ of certiorari and/or a writ ofmandamus and/or any other writ direction or orderto quash and set aside the impugned notice dated31/03/2021 under Section 148 of the Income-TaxAct, 1961 annexed hereto at Annexure ‘B’ alongwith preliminary order dated 10/09/2021 annexedhereto at Annexure ‘F’ for proceeding andcompleting Reassessment proceedings.
(B)Pending admission, hearing, and disposal ofthis petition, ad-interim relief be granted and therespondent be ordered to restrain from enforcingcompliance of the impugned notice dated31/03/2021 at Annexure ‘B’ and/or taking any othersteps in this regard including reassessment orderor implementation of preliminary order dated10/09/2021 at Annexure ‘F’ and further notices
issued for purpose of reassessment.
(C)Award the cost of this petition.
(D)Grant such other and further reliefs as thisHon’ble Court deems fit.”
2.After arguing for some time, learned advocate Mr. Patel,on instruction, seeks withdrawal.
3.The present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(SONIA GOKANI, J)
Bhoomi
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.