Income Tax Case
High Court
30 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
— v. P. Navelcar
Date of order
30 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In v. P. Navelcar, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2011
M/s Navelkar Estates DevelopersC/o Hotel Rajdhani,Dr. Atmaram Borkar Road,Panaji-Goa-403 001 a PartnershipFirm duly represented by its
Partner Shri Vijay V. P. Navelcar ... Petitioner
versus
1. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Office of the Commissioner of Income-Tax, EDC Complex, Patto Plaza, Panaji-Goa-403 001. Office of the Commissioner of Income-Tax, EDC Complex, Patto Plaza, Panaji-Goa-403 001.
2. The Income-Tax Officer,
Ward-1(2), Panaji, Office of the Commissioner of Income-Tax, EDC Complex, Patto Plaza, Commissioner of Income-Tax, EDC Complex, Patto Plaza,
Panaji-Goa-403 001. ... Respondents
Shri V. R. Tamba and Shri D. D. Zaveri, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Ms. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : S. A. BOBDE &
F. M. REIS, JJ.
DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2011.
ORAL JUDGMENT(Per S. A. BOBDE, J.)
Rule.
2.
Rule returnable forthwith.
3.Heard by consent.
4.The main contention of Shri V. R. Tamba, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is that the reasons have not been furnished to the Petitioner/Assessee for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the Assessee is not in a position to file objections to the issue on notice. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner points out to the case of GKN Driveshafts(India) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer andothers((2003) 1 SCC 72) wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the Assessing Officer is bound to furnish the reasons within a reasonable time so that the Assessee can file objections to issuance of notice and the Assessing Officer is bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order.
5.Ms. Asha Dessai, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent/Revenue states that the Revenue will furnish reasons as contemplated by the aforesaid Judgment to the Petitioner and that in fact they have already been dispatched.
6.In this view of the matter, we see no reason to entertain the matter any further. It is directed that the Petitioner shall be offered an opportunity to state his objection and the Assessing Officer shall decide the same by a speaking order in accordance with law.
7.Rule made absolute in the above terms.
S. A. BOBDE, J.
F. M. REIS, J.
RD
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.