Case LawHigh Court › Party Name : Tripura Cricket Asso v. The...

Party Name : Tripura Cricket Asso v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors

High Court 24 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · thcnc
Parties
Party Name : Tripura Cricket Asso v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
24 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Party Name : Tripura Cricket Asso v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Party Name : TRIPURA CRICKET ASSO. Vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T. VAIPHEI THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.TALAPATRA 24.01.2017. It is submitted by Mr. N. Dasgupta, the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals), Kolkata has allowed their appeal and, as such, he does not want to press thiswrit petition. He, however, submits that in view of the appellate order allowing its appeal, thepetitioner should be refunded Rs.2,61,44,624/- with interest accrued thereon, which was depositedin terms of the order dated 24.09.2015 passed by this Court. As and when the application in properform for refund of the aforesaid amount with interest is submitted by the petitioner before theappropriate authority, the same shall be refunded to it. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. The application will be submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from today before theappropriate authority. A copy of the appellate order dated 06.01.2017 is marked as “X” and is hereby part of the record.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan