Pashina International, Basti Sheikh Road,Jalandhar v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1,Jalandhar And Others
High Court
22 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pashina International, Basti Sheikh Road,Jalandhar v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1,Jalandhar And Others
Date of order
22 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pashina International, Basti Sheikh Road,Jalandhar v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1,Jalandhar And Others, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: Pankaj Jain and Mr.D.K.Goyal,Advocates, for the petitioner Sarvshri Yogesh Putney, Rajesh Katoch and Ms.Savita Saxena, Senior Standing Counselsfor the respondents A.K.SIKRI, CJ: (Oral) This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order of evendate recorded in CWP No.1335 of 2008 titled as Prikn...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CWP No. 19612 of 2008
Date of Decision: 22.2.2013
Pashina International, Basti Sheikh Road,Jalandhar
--Petitioner
Vs.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1,Jalandhar and others
--Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present:Mr. Pankaj Jain and Mr.D.K.Goyal,Advocates, for the petitioner
Sarvshri Yogesh Putney, Rajesh Katoch and Ms.Savita Saxena, Senior Standing Counselsfor the respondents
A.K.SIKRI, CJ: (Oral)
This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order of evendate recorded in CWP No.1335 of 2008 titled as Priknit Exports,B-
XXV/539/A/10,G.T Road Jalandhar Vs. Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax Central Circle-III Ludhiana and others.
(A.K.SIKRI)
CHIEFJUSTICE
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.