Pashmina Holdings Limited v. Asstt. Cit (Osd) Cir.2(2), Mumbai & Anr
High Court
07 Dec 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pashmina Holdings Limited v. Asstt. Cit (Osd) Cir.2(2), Mumbai & Anr
Date of order
07 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pashmina Holdings Limited v. Asstt. Cit (Osd) Cir.2(2), Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
rsk
1 ITA-873-12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.873 OF 2012
Pashmina Holdings Limited
Vs.
Asstt. CIT (OSD) Cir.2(2), Mumbai & Anr.
...Appellant
...Respondents
-------
Mr. B. D. Damodar i/b Kanga & Co. for Appellant. None for Respondents.
-------
CORAM
DATED
:K. R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.:7 DECEMBER 2021.
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
P. C. :
Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2.Mr. Damodar for appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appealsince appellant has settled the matter under Scheme of Vivad Se VishwasAct, 2020.
3.Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
4.Refund of Court fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue