Case Law › High Court › Passed In _Cwpft6184,Aott_ Titled As “Ba...

Passed In _Cwpft6184,Aott_ Titled As “Bajwa Developers Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Jax And Another”

High Court 02 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

02 Sep 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Passed In _Cwpft6184,Aott_ Titled As “Bajwa Developers Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Jax And Another”, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH. CWP-16196-2021 (O&M)Date of decision : 02.09.2021 Bajwa Developers Limited _... Petitione Vs_ Commissioner of Income Tax and Another ....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present:Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. |AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) Taken up through video conferencing. Present petition stands dismissed in terms of order of even date passed in|CWPFT6184,AOTTtitled as “Bajwa Developers Limited Vs.Commissioner of Income Jax and Another” September 02, 2021tripti (AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE ( ALKA SARIN )JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.