Patiala Urban Planning And Development Authority v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7249 of 2014 (O&M)Decided on : 15.07.2014 Patiala Urban Planning and Development Authority . . . Petitioner Versus Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Ravi Shankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) CM No.8054-CWP of 2014 Written statement filed along with application on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at appropriate place. CM stands disposed of. CWP No. 7249 of 2014 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the writ petition, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has decided the appeals for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. Therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 2.Learned counsel for the revenue does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3.Disposed of as infructuous. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE July 15, 2014 J.Ram (JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE