Patidar Oil Cake Industries v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
19 Jul 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Patidar Oil Cake Industries v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
19 Jul 2001
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Patidar Oil Cake Industries v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ PATIDAR OIL CAKE INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 133 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
@
PATIDAR OIL CAKE INDUSTRIES
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 133 of 1987
MR RK PATEL for Petitioner No. 1
NR BB NAIK for MR RP BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 27/07/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
�At the instance of the applicant-assessee, the
following question of law has been referred to this court for its opinion by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'C' under the provisions of sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as
'the Act'). "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the provisions of sec. 40(b) of the I.T. Act 1961 were rightly applied in the assessee's case? 2.�Learned advocate Shri R.K. Patel has appeared for the applicant and learned advocate Shri B.B. Naik has appeared for the respondent-revenue. 3.�Our attention has been drawn to the judgment delivered by this court in I.T.R. No. 22/86 dated 19th July 2001 wherein a similar question of law had been referred to this court.
4.�Looking to the law laid down by this court in the said judgment, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative i.e. against the assessee and in favour of the revenue. �The reference thus stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
�����(A.R. Dave, J.) �����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
(hn)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.