Pavan Gaur v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-24

$~83 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9283/2019 PAVAN GAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Apoorv P. Tripathi and Mr. Apaan Mittal, Advs. Apaan Mittal, Advs. versus THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-24 & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agarwal, SSC, Ms. Sakshi Sehawal, Mr. Akshat Singh, JSCs and Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan and Ms. Harshita Kotru, Advs. Sehawal, Mr. Akshat Singh, JSCs and Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan and Ms. Harshita Kotru, Advs. Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. alongwith Mr. Pramod Kumar Chaubey, AR for R-4 Mr. Pramod Kumar Chaubey, AR for R-4 CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R23.09.2025 % CM APPL. 60618/2025(exem) 1.Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.The application is disposed of. 2.The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 9283/2019 and CM APPL. 60617/2025 3.Mr. Apoorv Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner submits that though he has filed an application for bringing on record the settlement agreement dated 11.08.2025, entered into by the petitioner with the respondent no. 4, as the petitioner has made the payment with the Income Tax Authority under the scheme Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), pursuant to the settlement dated 11.08.2025 between the petitioner and the respondent no. 4, he shall withdraw the Writ Petition but seeking liberty in the eventuality, the claim of the petitioner with the Income Tax Authority is not accepted under the said scheme, to revive the Writ Petition. 4.Granting the above liberty, the petition and the connected applications are dismissed, as withdrawn. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2025ss VINOD KUMAR, J