Pawan Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kurukshetra (Haryana
High Court
02 Apr 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pawan Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kurukshetra (Haryana
Date of order
02 Apr 2013
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pawan Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kurukshetra (Haryana, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The assessee has claimed the following substantial questions of law as arises out of an order passed by the Tribunal:- (i) (ii) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, thedisallowance of interest payment made u/s 40(A)(2)(a) r.w.Section 29, 145 of the Act is sustainable without `disch...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH****
I.T.A. No.256 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision:02.04.2013
Pawan Kumar Proprietor Saraswati Gas Service
Vs.
.....Petitioner
Commissioner of Income Tax, Kurukshetra (Haryana)
.....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:-Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for the appellant.
****
HEMANT GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,1961 arises out of an order dated 15.5.2012 passed by Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Chandigarh `A' Bench, Chandigarh for the assessment year 2008-2009.
The assessee has claimed the following substantial questions of
law as arises out of an order passed by the Tribunal:-
(i)
(ii)
Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, thedisallowance of interest payment made u/s 40(A)(2)(a) r.w.Section 29, 145 of the Act is sustainable without `dischargingthe onus' for `returning the findings' on the mandatoryrequirements of the provisions of law?
Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, whilepassing `such orders' u/s 254(1), the tribunal has to recordfindings on the `material facts' containing `material particulars'and/ or simply affirm the CIT(A) order without the `applicationof mind'?
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant
I.T.A. No.256 of 2012 (O&M)
wishes to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to raise the question ofdisallowance of interest in subsequent assessment years in accordance withlaw.
( HEMANT GUPTA ) JUDGE
April 02, 2013renu
( RITU BAHRI ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.