Case LawHigh Court › Pawan Kumar Tibrewal v. Income Tax Offic...

Pawan Kumar Tibrewal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 44(1) And Ors

High Court 12 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Pawan Kumar Tibrewal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 44(1) And Ors
Date of order
12 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pawan Kumar Tibrewal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 44(1) And Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of availability of alternative remedy by way of statutory appealand for the reason that the aforesaid impugned assessment order is neitherwithout jurisdiction nor there is any procedural irregularity that theimpugned order is not an ex parte order, I am not inclined to entertain thiswrit pet...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

OD –4 ORDER SHEET WPO/979/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE PAWAN KUMAR TIBREWALVSINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 44(1) AND ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN Date: 12[th] June, 2023. Appearance:Mr. Rites Goel, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv.…For the Respondents The Court : Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugnedassessment order under Section 147 read with Section 144/144B of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 relating to assessment year 2018-19. I have perusedthe aforesaid impugned order which is an appealable order before the CIT(Appeals) under the statute and without availing the alternative remedy byway of appeal, petitioner has approached this Writ Court under Article 226of the Constitution of India. In view of availability of alternative remedy by way of statutory appealand for the reason that the aforesaid impugned assessment order is neitherwithout jurisdiction nor there is any procedural irregularity that theimpugned order is not an ex parte order, I am not inclined to entertain thiswrit petition being WPO 979 of 2023 and accordingly the same is dismissed. Considering the prayer of the petitioner, liberty is granted to thepetitioner to file appeal against the assessment order within fifteen daysfrom date and if such appeal is filed by the petitioner within the timestipulated herein, the same shall be considered in accordance with law andon merit without insisting on the point of limitation. TR/ (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan