P.dhanalakshmi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Viii, Vi Floor, Kannammai Buildings
High Court
27 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
P.dhanalakshmi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Viii, Vi Floor, Kannammai Buildings
Date of order
27 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Remanded
Case summary
In P.dhanalakshmi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Viii, Vi Floor, Kannammai Buildings, the High Court (2020) remanded the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.No.27073 of 2014andM.P.No.1 of 2014
P.Dhanalakshmi
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax - VIII, VI Floor, Kannammai Buildings, No.611, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006.
2.The Income Tax Officer, Business Ward - III (3), I Floor, Kannammai Buildings, No.611, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for therecords relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondentin File No.C.No.861(12)CIT-VIII/2013-14 dated 18.07.2014 andquash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Soundararajan
For Respondents: M/s.Hema Muralikrishnan
Standing Counsel
O R D E R
When the case is taken up for hearing, both side counselsfairly submit that the issue is now covered by an earlierdecision of this Court in C.K.Logadoss Vs. The Commissioner ofIncome Tax - VIII, order dated 03.12.2019 in W.P.No.21043 of2015. The petitioner was also a co-sharer of the property. Theoperative portion of the order reads as under:-
4.The learned counsel for the petitionersubmits that the matter may be remanded backto the 1[st] respondent to pass a speaking order
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1
in terms of the decision of the Tribunal whichwere impugned in T.C.No.505 of 2014 andT.C.No.686 of 2014. The learned counsel forthe respondent (Revenue) has no objection forthe matter being remanded back to the 1[st]respondent to pass a speaking order in termsof the decision of the Tribunal in the case ofthe petitioner's siblings. The petitioner isaged 80 years as on the date of the filingWrit Petition. The Commissioner of Income Taxthe 1[st] respondent is therefore requested topass speaking order within a period of fourweeks from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order in accordance with law, taking noteof the decision of the Tribunal. Needless tostate before passing such order, thepetitioner shall be heard by the 1[st]respondent.
2. In view of the above order, the present Writ Petitionis disposed in terms of the above order. No cost.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
jen
To1.The Commissioner of Income Tax - VIII, VI Floor, Kannammai Buildings, No.611, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006.
2.The Income Tax Officer, Business Ward - III (3), I Floor, Kannammai Buildings, No.611, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006.
+1cc to Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate SR.17301
+1cc to Mr.K.Soundararajan, Advocate SR.17160
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.