Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Chandigarh And Others

CWP No. 23761 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: May 21, 2013CWP No. 23761 of 2012 Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.) …Petitioner Versus Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRIHON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: - Mr. Deepak Chopra, Advocate and Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate and Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocatefor the respondents. 1To be referred to the Reporters or not?2Whether the Judgment should be reported in the2Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest HEMANT GUPTA, J. C.M. No. 7482 of 2013 Civil Misc. Application is allowed. Written statement is taken on record. CWP No. 23761 of 2012 In view of the averments made in the written statement, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. While dismissing the writ petition as not pressed, weclarify that the appeal and misc. application for stay of demand CWP No. 23761 of 2012 filed by the petitioner and pending before the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench shall be decided in accordancewith law. A copy of this order be given dastito learned counselfor the petitioner. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 21.05.2013Atul (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE