Perfochem India Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7(1
High Court
09 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Perfochem India Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7(1
Date of order
09 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Perfochem India Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7(1, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 635 OF 2009
WRIT PETITION NO. 635 OF 2009
Perfochem India Pvt.Ltd . ... Petitioner
Vs.
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax-7(1)
Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. K.B.Bhujle with Mr. P..Bhujle for the petitioner.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND
J.H.BHATIA,JJ.
J.H.BHATIA,JJ.
DATE: 9th April, 2009.
DATE: 9th April, 2009.
P.C
P.C.
1. Rule. Heard forthwith.
2. The petitioner has come to this Court against the
order passed by Respondent No.3 while granting stay,
directed the petitioner to deposit further amounts to
the tune of Rs.55,00,000/-. The petitioner has already
paid Rs.22,00,000/- .
2
3. Having heard Counsel, we are of the opinion that a prima facie case is made out and hardship would be caused if the order is not stayed and the appellate authority hear the matter on Monday, the 13th April,
2009.
4. In our opinion, after hearing parties, the ends of justice would be met if the impugned order is set aside and the appellate authority is directed to dispose of the appeal, at any rate, not later than 15 days from
13th April, 2009.
5. The Respondents are directed not to make any
further recoveries from the petitioner.
6. the parties to co-operate with the appellate
authority. The appellate authority not to grant any
adjournment.
7. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to
costs.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
3
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.