Case LawHigh Court › Petilioner v. Director General Of Income...

Petilioner v. Director General Of Income Tax & Anr

High Court 17 Apr 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Petilioner v. Director General Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
17 Apr 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Petilioner v. Director General Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Consequently, we accede to this request of Dr Singhvi and direct that thewrit petitions are dismissedwithdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$--12-17 *IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI -I-W.P.(C) 2402/2013& CM Nos. 4548/2013& 4549/2013andW.P.(C) 2408/2013& CM Nos. 4557/2013& 4558/2013W.P.(C) 2409/2013 & CM Nos. 4560/2013 & 4561/2013W.P.(C) 2408/2013& CM Nos. 4557/2013& 4558/2013W.P.(C) 2409/2013 & CM Nos. 4560/2013 & 4561/2013 W.P.(C) 2410/2013 & CM Nos. 4563/2013 & 4564/2013 W.P.(C) 2412/2013 & CM Nos. 4566/2013 & 4567/2013 W.P.(C) 2413/2013& CM Nos. 4569/2013& 4570/2013 NOKIA INDIA PVT. LTD ...Petilioner Through: Dr A.M. Singhvi, Sr Advocate with Mr VikasSrivastava, Mr S.R. Patnaik, Ms Akansha Aggarwal,Mr Parag Mohanty, Ms Leeneshwari Maldiijaniand Mr Nidhiram Singh versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX & ANR...RespondentsThrough: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Mr Alok ParasaranKumar and Mr Puneet Gupta COl^M:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMEDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU fORDER %17.04.2013 We have heard the counsel for the parties at some length. Mr Sabharwal,appearing on behalf of the respondents, states that if the petitioner files theappeals under Section 246A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, then, till thedisposal of the appeals by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), nocoercive measures would be taken by the respondent.Pie also requests that aspecific time frame be fixed for conclusion of the appeals. if In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent,Dr Singhvi,appearingon behalf of the petitioner,requestspermissiontowithdraw these writ petitions with libeity to the petitionerto file the appealsbefore the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). Consequently, we accede to this request of Dr Singhvi and direct that thewrit petitions are dismissedwithdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. To make itclear, the concessioniTiade by the respondentwith regard to no coercivemeasures would be operative only if the petitioner files the appeals within fourdays from today.The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) shall dispose ofthe appeals, if so filed, as early as possible and latest by 31.05.2013.During thisperiod and, five days thereafter, no coercive measures would be taken by therespondents for recovery of the amount demanded. The writ petitions stand withdrawn as above. All the pending applicationsalso stand dismissedas withdrawn. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J VIBHU BAKIIRU, J APRIL 17, 2013
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan