In Petitione v. Income Tax Officer-Iii (2, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-21521 of 2013 (O&M)Date of Decision : 29.01.2016
Anil Bhasin
_.... Petitione
Versus
Income Tax Officer-III (2)
.... RESpondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present:Mr. Rohit Sood, Advocatefor the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocatefor the respondent.
FATEH DEEP SINGH, J.
For orders, see the judgment of even date passed inconnectedCRM-M-1893-2009. titled as S.K. Bajaj vs. Income TaxOfficer-Ifl (2)77
January 29, 2016
Dpr
(FATEH DEEP SINGH)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.