Case LawHigh Court › Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd v. Commis...

Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 16 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
16 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Noquestion of law, much less substantial question of law is involved.Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 385 OF 2005WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 386 OF 2005 M/s. Deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. ).......Appellant versus Commissioner of Income-tax City III, Mumbai )........ Respondant. Mr. B.V. Zhaveri for the Appellant Ms. AGP for State. Mr. for Respondent no.3. Mr. for the Respondents.4 and 13. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 16TH JULY 2008. P.C.: 1..The learned counsel appearing for the appellant fairlystates that in the case of the same assessee, similar questions wereraised which have already been rejected by the court in IncomeTax Appeal No.345 of 2005 vide order dated 23[rd] June 2008,hence the present appeal also deserves to be dismissed. Noquestion of law, much less substantial question of law is involved.Appeal stands dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan