Phi Seeds Pvt. Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
24 Apr 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Phi Seeds Pvt. Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Phi Seeds Pvt. Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~41.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3499/2017
PHI SEEDS PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocate
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R% 24.04.2017
CM APPL No. 15299/2017 (for exemption)
1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
WP (C) 3499/2017
2. Notice. Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, the learned Senior standing counsel accepts notice.
3. It is pointed out by Ms. Kavita Jha, learned counsel for the Petitioner, that as many as 10 appeals filed by the Petitioner are pending decision before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The earliest of the appeals has been pending since 1[st] June, 2006. Earlier by order dated 7[th] September 2015 in W.P.(C) No.8521/2015 filed by the same Petitioner this Court had given definite directions to ITAT to dispose of the appeals in a time bound manner. For some reason, that has not happened till date. WP (C) 3499/2017 Page 1 of 2
4. The Court again reiterates its request to ITAT to give short dates in the pending appeals of the Petitioner and to ensure that final arguments are heard and a judgment is delivered in all of them not later than 3 months from today. The ITAT should request both the parties to file their respective written notes or submission within four weeks to facilitate early disposal of the pending appeals.
5. It would be open to the Petitioner, on the strength of this order, to request the ITAT to advance the next date of hearing of the appeals.
6. The petition is disposed of.
7. Order Dasti.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
APRIL 24, 2017 ‘anb’
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.