> v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court
31 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
> v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
31 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In > v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 144, Section 147 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: 2.In view of the above, we dismiss the instant writ petition leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies which are otherwise available. YASHWANT VARMA, J. MAY 31, 2024/MJ PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~33
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8467/2024 & CM APPL. 34903/2024 VANI PINNAMANENI ..... Petitioner
..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Nageshwar Rao and Mr.Parth, Advs.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Sunil Agarwal, Sr.SC with Mr.Shivansh B.Pandya, Jr.SC and Mr.Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv for I.T.Dept.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R31.05.2024
%
1.Undisputedly, pursuant to the reassessment action which was initiated way back in March 2023, a final assessment order has come to be passed on 30 March 2024 under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. We consequently find no justification to entertain a writ challenge at this stage.
2.In view of the above, we dismiss the instant writ petition leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies which are otherwise available.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MAY 31, 2024/MJ
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.