> v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bangalore & Anr

$~4 * * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10723/2024, CM APPL. 44150/2024 (Stay) MOCHIKO SHOES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Udit Sharma, Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh, Advocates. versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sidharth Sinha, SSC with Ms. Dachita Shahi, Ms. Anuja Pethia, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAO R D E R30.08.2024 % Although the writ petitioner assails the intimation dated 29 May 2024 referable to Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act”], learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted her submissions for a direction being framed calling upon the Assessing Officer [“AO”] to dispose of the pending application under Section 154 of the Act. In view of the aforesaid, subject to due verification of all facts and contentions on merits being kept open, we dispose of the writ petition by directing the concerned AO to duly examine the application for rectification which has been made and to dispose of the same with due expedition preferably within a period of six weeks from today. YASHWANT VARMA, J. AUGUST 30, 2024/neha RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.