> v. Income Tax Office, Ward 3(2) New Delhi
High Court
19 Aug 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
> v. Income Tax Office, Ward 3(2) New Delhi
Date of order
19 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In > v. Income Tax Office, Ward 3(2) New Delhi, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.The appeal along with connected applications is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~76
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 311/2025 CM APPL. 50609/2025 (Exemption)ARTI ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Ram Upadhyay, Adv.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 3(2) NEW DELHI.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin and Ms. Easha, JSCs
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARO R D E R19.08.2025
%
1.The challenge in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is to an order dated 18.12.2024 of ITAT.
2.After some submissions, Mr. Ram Upadhyay, learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw the appeal.
3.The appeal along with connected applications is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
AUGUST 19, 2025 cd
VINOD KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue