Case Law › High Court › Pinakin Kantilal Patel v. Dy. Comm. Of I...

Pinakin Kantilal Patel v. Dy. Comm. Of Income Tax And Anr

High Court 09 Jul 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

09 Jul 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Pinakin Kantilal Patel v. Dy. Comm. Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 523 OF 2019 Pinakin Kantilal Patel ….. Applicant. VERSUS Dy. Comm. of Income Tax and Anr. ..... Respondents. Mr. Ashok P. Mundargi, Mr. Dinbandhu Choudhary, a/w Mr. Vijay R. Garad, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Sham V. Walve, Advocate for Respondent No.1.Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent – State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE J. DATE : 09[th] JULY, 2019. PC. 1.This is ninth application for seeking permission to travel abroad.Earlier 8 applications were allowed by this Court. 2.Applicants intends to travel abroad to Switzerland, United ArabEmirates, Czech Republic, Greece, Italy from 15.08.2019 till the end ofApril 2020, since petitioner wish to travel for aforesaid period, the passportauthority is directed to consider the prayer for renewal of the passport andaccordingly shall take decision as expeditiously as possible however, by theend of July, 2019 subject to filing the application by the applicant for such an renewal of passport within one week from today. 3.List the Criminal Application No. 614 of 2011 for hearing on01.08.20196. 4.With the above observations, application stands disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.