Pinakin Kantilal Patel v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax….Respondentsspl. Range 20, Mumbai & Ors

Dusane 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 960 OF 2016INCRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.614 OF 2011 Pinakin Kantilal Patel ....Applicant Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax….RespondentsSpl. Range 20, Mumbai & Ors. Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal, Advocate for Applicant.Mr. S.R. Agarkar, A.P.P. for the respondent- State. Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.Date : 9[th] January, 2017 P.C. 1This is the sixth application filed by the applicant for permission to travel abroad. The earlier applications had been filed for different travels during the period between 20[th ]November, 2013 to 5[th] February, 2016. 2 Though the leave sought by the present application is for the period 20[th] January, 2017 to 28[th] April, 2018, Mr. Bhujbal, the learned advocate for the applicant restricts the application for the period 10[th] January, 2017 to 16[th] September, Dusane appp960.2016 2017. Perused the earlier orders granting permission to travel abroad for the applicant. The record shows that the applicant has not violated the liberty granted to him earlier. The application states details of the places of visit abroad by the applicant and the durations of such visits. Hence, the application is allowed for the period 10[th] January, 2017 to 16[th ]September, 2017. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.)