Pine Labs Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 19(1) New Delhi & Anr
High Court
15 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pine Labs Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 19(1) New Delhi & Anr
Date of order
15 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pine Labs Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 19(1) New Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.The writ petition consequently shall stand disposed of on the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~48
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 159/2024
PINE LABS PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Mr. Deepesh Jain and Mr. Abhisek Singhvi, Advs.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 19(1) NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC along with Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Nangia, SCs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R15.05.2024
%
1.We are informed that insofar as prayer (a) is concerned, the same stands duly satisfied and thus nothing further survives.
2.Insofar as the reliefs claimed in prayers (b) and (c) are concerned, we are informed by Mr. Rai who on instructions states that the request for refund has been duly attended to and that appropriate steps for release shall be taken within a period of six weeks by the concerned Assessing Officer The statement so made is recorded and accepted.
3.The writ petition consequently shall stand disposed of on the above terms.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MAY 15, 2024/RW
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.