Case LawHigh Court › Pipefield, Rep. By Its v. Commissioner O...

Pipefield, Rep. By Its v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Non. Corporate Ward 19(4) Che

High Court 13 Aug 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Pipefield, Rep. By Its v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Non. Corporate Ward 19(4) Che
Date of order
13 Aug 2020
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Pipefield, Rep. By Its v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Non. Corporate Ward 19(4) Che, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.08.2020 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P. Nos.6235 & 6240 of 2020andWMP. Nos.7339 & 7349 of 2020 Steel House , Represented by its Partner Mr. S. Madhusudan, No. 11, Gangai Amman Kovil Street, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. .. Petitioner in W.P. No.6235 of 2020 PIPEFIELD, Rep. by its Partner , A.Sankaralingam,No.11, Gangai Amman Kovil Street,Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. .. Petitioner inVs. W.P. No.6240 of 2019 1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Non. Corporate Ward 19(4) CHE No. 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road , Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 19(5) CHE No. 121 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. .. Respondents in both WPs Common Order: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India praying to Writ of Certiorari to call forthe records on the file of the Respondents and quash theimpugned order in ITBA / COM / F / 17 / 2019-20 / 1025771267 and1025772682 (1) dated 26.02.2020 passed by the 2[nd] Respondent asillegal and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Udayakumar For Respondent : Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, Senior Standing Counsel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ C O M M O N O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed on recordpetitions for stay of the demand arising from an orders ofassessment dated 26.02.2020 in relation to assessment year 2019-20. The seal on the petitions is that of the Income TaxOfficer. Let these stay petitions be transferred to the Officeof the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), before whom thepetitioners’ appeals are pending. Let the stay applications bedisposed within a period of four weeks from today, i.e., on orbefore 14.09.2020, after hearing the petitioners, eithervirtually or by way of physical hearing as may be mutuallyconvenient to the parties. There shall be an order of interimstay of recovery till 14.09.2020. 2. The Writ Petitions are disposed in the aforesaid terms.No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Non. Corporate Ward 19(4) CHE No. 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road , Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 19(5) CHE No. 121 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. +2cc to Mr.S.Udayakumar, Advocate Sr.No.26592 & 26593 W.P. Nos.6235 & 6240 of 2020andWMP. Nos.7339 & 7349 of 2020 ssv (co)rr ii (10/09/2020)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan