Case LawHigh Court › Piyush B. Virani v. The Dy. Commissioner...

Piyush B. Virani v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 49

High Court 24 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Piyush B. Virani v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 49
Date of order
24 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Piyush B. Virani v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 49, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Appeal is, accordingly, rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 620 OF 2007 Piyush B. Virani. VersusThe Dy. Commissioner of Income TaxSpecial Range 49. ...........Appellant. ..........Respondent. Mr. Sameer Dalal for the Appellant. Mr. P. S. Sahadevan for the Respondent. P.C.: CORAM :BILAL NAZKIandA. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ.DATED :24TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. In this appeal the question framed is “Whether the Tribunal was rightin not condoning the delay of 825 days”. We do not see that this is asubstantial question of law. Even then we have perused the record.Admittedly there is a delay of 825 days and the delay is sought to beexplained on extraneous ground that earlier the appellant was undermisbelief and later on the lawyer had advised to file appeal. 2.Appeal is, accordingly, rejected. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan